Never ask a parasite

Never ask a parasite how to fight parasitism. You certainly would get the wrong answer.

The interpretation of advantage, advancement, and even progress is relative. It depends on the observer’s position. The same is true for social parasites.

  • Ask a mafiosi and he will probably suggest that he should take over police control to reduce crime.
  • Ask a beggar and he would probably suggest giving more to charity.
  • Ask an academic and she would probably suggest raising taxes.
  • Ask a politician and she would probably suggest a reduction in people’s freedom.
  • Ask a bureaucrat and she would probably disapprove bureaucracy in other departments.

Therefore, never judge a political opinion without analyzing the social background it derives from.


Creative Commons License

This work by Paul Netman is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Fauceir theory is developed and © by Mato Nagel and available at www.fauceir.org.

Advertisements

Why didn’t Nobel endow a prize in economics?

Because he knew that a good economist wouldn’t need a prize. An excellent economist is a rich economist.

Picture from Nobelprize.org

It was at the beginning of the 20th century when the most prudent people realized that science and innovation is what drives the economy and social evolution. By that time—and it didn’t have change too much—science’s most prestigious branches were chronically underfunded and scientists scarified their money, health, and sometimes even their life for scientific progress. Nobel’s intention was to bolster those devoted people and by that way to support social progress.

The Nobel prize was a great success right from the beginning. The fist prize winners, especially those in nuclear physics, such as Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, Antoine Henri Becquerel, Pierre Curie, Marie Curie, Johannes Diderik van der Waals, Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck, and Albert Einstein raised this prize’s reputation. A reputation that by the years attracted growing media attention.

While media attention has been growing the uniqueness of the laureate’s scientific discoveries is not. The Nobel prize became a hype about shallow science. (A tendency that culminated in a Nobel Peace Prize for popular science in 2007.) The Nobel Prize is nothing more but an ideological tool.

When it became a potent ideological lever, the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was started. It wasn’t Nobels intention, I assume, to create an award for propaganda. As ideology has never been good science, I would think being awarded with a Nobel Prize in Economics is not at all good but foremost bad reputation. Good economists operate a good economy. They are rich anyway.


Creative Commons License

This work by Paul Netman is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Fauceir theory is developed and © by Mato Nagel and available at www.fauceir.org.